Re: RJ-48C?

Jacob Suter (jsuter@intrastar.net)
Thu, 12 Dec 1996 00:40:07 -0600

Screw it.... tell the telco what you want, and tell them to reverse
engineer the PRI's to where the sun doesn't shine unless they do it right
(two RJ-45's)

I would think with the protocol involved (T1), having all that signaling in
one small connector (RJ-45/RJ-48C) would be a serious problem... TCP/IP may
not get too bent when its gotta wait for an abort error retry, but those
analog customers are gonna BITCH.

JS

----------
> If I understood Evan's message correctly, his phone company is setting it
> up so that both PRI's come in through the one RJ-48C jack right?
>
> What would you do then.. bulid your own litle break out box which splits
> the pairs into two jacks?
>
> On Wed, 11 Dec 1996, Ronnie D. Franklin wrote:
>
> > An RJ-48C is an RJ-45 with a tab on the side of the connector.. The
RJ-45
> > is actually a Audio or Analog connector.. An RJ-45 connector will work
> > fine into an RJ-48C jack.
> >
> > > From: Evan Champion <evanc@synapse.net>
> > >
> > > Bell is coming to do our 2 PRI install tomorrow. Apparently what
they
> > > are doing is putting in an HDSL box which has a single RJ-48C port
> > > which will carry both PRIs.
> > >
> > > My question is what am I supposed to do with the RJ-48C? The PM3 has
> > > dual RJ-45 ports rather than an RJ-48C.
>