>Paradigm. When I see/hear 'PC' I think M$-DOS/Win/Win95 or OS/2.
>
Yes that is what I meant. All you have to do is add the second sub/net
route for the local interface and yer done. The problem with gated is
exactly the same as a default router. You get double your packets, double
your fun for each cross boundry packet.
>Actually I'm not sure about the latest stuff with OS/2. I'm also not
>
OS/2 has all the right stuff. We are utilizing many OS/2 boxes with our net
and they route and talk and work reliably. They can even gate.
Your first answer was the one that tells the tale. Livingston don't do
multihome. There are multiple solutions to the problem, as we have seen.
It is just the most efficient solution that evades us.
>Now, when you talk about putting UNIX on PC hardware, that's another matter.
>
>That's a real operating system. ;-)
O boy! is it time for os wars? no no I didn't mean it! aaaarrrrrrggh.
there goes the bandwidth.
--- Brian K. Jackson who? bkjackson@tensar.com Tensar Inc. what? Software Engineering & Consulting Services Salt Lake City, Utah where?