Re: [Fwd: New Mailing List for PM3]

Michael J. Hartwick (hartwick@primeline.net)
Mon, 23 Dec 1996 19:11:48 -0500 (EST)

You would need to need to monitor two lists, and would likely get more
email, then one list. For the PM3 users that ask general enough questions
and can as a result expect an answer on either list. I don't have a PM3
but, want to follow it along as I will eventually get one.

Just my vote for keeping the one list.

On Mon, 23 Dec 1996, Andrew Fried wrote:

>If you subscribed to both groups, wouldn't you receive the same amount of
>email that you would with one group with both topics?
>
>At 06:39 PM 12/23/96 -0500, Stephen Zedalis wrote:
>>
>>I disagree, the PM-3 is not substantially different than the other
>>Portmasters. In fact, with the imminent release of ComOS 3.5 for
>>PM-2s, ORs and IRX, they will be much closer. Plus developments for
>>the PM-3 may give inklings of modifications that could be done on the
>>PM-2's to give them an all-digital upgrade path. I would hate to have
>>to monitor yet another mailing list.
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Hartwick, VE3SLQ
Hartwick Communications Consulting
hartwick@primeline.net