Re: Putting livingstons on seperate class-c's

John G. Thompson (jgt10@livingston.com)
Fri, 2 May 1997 22:09:44 -0700 (PDT)

I see three possible directions:

1 - Take the new class C and subnet it on the 224 netmask giving you 8
subnets with network addresses at 0, 32, 64, 96, 128, 160, 192 and 224.
Assign each PM-2E a subnet for the dynamic IP pool by setting the
assigned address to the network address plus one (1, 33, 65, etc.) and
then setting static routes in the routers surrounding the PMs (including
the PMs themselves.)

Nice thing about this is that static IP assignments are unaffected by the
change. Tough part is getting all the static routes setup.

2 - Move the PMs onto the new class C and partition out the dynamic pools
anyway you want (although using the 224 subnet scheme is a useful hedge
againist having to subnet again.)

Problem here is that any static IP accounts will need to be moved as well.

3 - use OSPF.

Don't know enough to have a clue how to start that process. :\

JGT

On Fri, 2 May 1997, Jason Hatch wrote:
>
> These are Pm2e2's. I can't just assign IP addresses to the first starting
> at xxx.xxx.xxx.1 and the second at xxx.xxx.xxx.31 and so on? I have to
> subnet them to 30 IP subnets (which makes sense, but I suck at figuring
> out netmasks).
>
> -Jason
>
> On Fri, 2 May 1997, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote:
>
> > At 09:20 AM 5/2/97 -0500, Jason Hatch wrote:
> > >We're running out of address space here and I wanted to put my portmasters
> > >on their own class-c. Is this as simple as setting the assigned
> > >address-pool the an IP within that class-c or does something else have to
> > >be done? I can still leave the livingston's main IP on the same network
> > >its on now, right?
> > >
> > >As it stands, my router accepts RIP packets from the portmaster, so
> > >whenever someone dials in, it adds a route to that IP making the
> > >portmaster the gateway.
> >
> > Keep the ether0's on the same class C as the rest of the network and either
> > static route each subnet to the respective PM or use OSPF.
> >
> > (the other possibility will use the first PM as a gateway for the others,
> > but I don't like that method, as it adds a hop)
> >
> > Are these PM2's or PM3's?
> >
> > Reminds me, need to finish up a simple OSPF setup page.
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------
> > Jeff Mountin - System/Network Administrator
> > jeff@mixcom.net
> >
> > MIX Communications
> > Serving the Internet since 1990
> >
>
>

John G. Thompson Livingston Enterprises Inc. Phone: (800) 458-9966
JOAT(MON) 4464 Willow Road Fax: (510) 426-8951
support@livingston.com Pleasanton, CA 94588 http://www.livingston.com