Re: USR TC vs. PM3 Test results

Andy Doolittle (andy@server.livingston.com)
Wed, 21 May 1997 15:34:31 -0700 (PDT)

On Wed, 21 May 1997, Kevin Smith wrote:

> At 12:22 PM 5/21/97 -0500, PM Mailing List wrote:
> >
> >U.S. Robotics Total Control Enterprise Network Hub
> > and Livingston PortMaster 3
> > Comparison Results Overview
> >
> >http://www.usr.com/business/30409_d.html
> >
> >I thought this might prove to be an interesting link. Any one have any
> >comments? According to the test results, the PM3 fails miserably early on
> >while the Ascend 4004 performance degrades slowly, while the TC (of
> >course, this is on USR's home page) runs no problemo.
>
> And of course we all start over when the 56K modems start popping up
> everywhere.
>
> Just as an FYI, in our LAB testing we did not see this problem with the PM-3
> either. We see drop-offs with the TC after some number of sessions, but then
> we must also be doing something wrong... :)

Yeah, but in this case it's OK 8^)

> Kevin Smith Updated Service and Support
> Ascend Communications Resources are now at:
> http://www.ascend.com/service
>

andy
++++
In Redmond, no one can hear you scream ...

My opinions, of course, are my own, unless they were given to me by my
employer.

Andrew Doolittle - Sr. Engineer Livingston Enterprises
email: andy@livingston.com vmail: (800)458-9966
smail: 4464 Willow Road, Pleasanton, CA 94588