Re: Has USR licenced comos?
Beth Montes (bmontes@iland.net)
Tue, 27 May 1997 13:53:28 -0500
At 01:43 PM 5/27/97 -0500, you wrote:
>On Tue, 27 May 1997, Beth Montes wrote:
>
>> >So basically USR sucks cuz they cant even write their own comos? Why would
>> >anyone buy a total control over a pm 3?
>>
>> Because their modems work, and connect to about everything
>> out there. Each has its strengths and weaknesses -- Livingston
>> came from their comm server background, and USR's obvious
>> history and strength is in the modem arena. The Couriers in the
>> TC hub are about as flawless as it gets, IMHO.
>
>Okay so what will need to happen for Livingston to be sold over Total
>Controls is better connection to everyone else's modems?
Yup. And Livingston is working on it.
>What I would HATE to see happen is an ISP have to have a TC rack and a
>SOMETHING ELSE (like a PM 3) rack to accomodate both sets of users of 56k
>technology.
That's what we're implementing as an interim solution in our
larger markets (>200 lines) until a 56K standard emerges.
Beth
_____________________________________________
Beth Montes I-Land Internet Services
bmontes@iland.net http://www.iland.net
vx: 816-827-5111 x21 Sedalia, MO
_____________________________________________