> you know - we solved this problem by doing both - PM3 and the TotalLOSS (it
The skeleton is out of the closet now. :)
> _is_ totalloss.binary.net :) Anyway - awhile ago - when people were discussing
> the lab test done comparing PM3 and TC - I actually looked at all of this with
> the smile as I can personally do a real "field" test with the same conditions
> described by the lab - and.... prove nothing. One thing for sure - both "pros"
> and "cons" in the test description are not applicable to field (we have the
> exact CT1s - one coming to USR and one to PM3 - both are half loaded for now).
> All I can tell - we have higher connect rate on the USR TC than on the PM3 -
> measured both by cps and by reported transmit speed. And, of course, the nice
> part about USR - is X2 - but unfortunately in our phone-land we don't see
> higher than 50kbps connect rates on X2.
Gawd, now I feel great about everything, sitting here with 3 PM3s and
it's getting real close to time to get another one. I don't think I can
take anymore good news tonight. :<
Livingston please get those (loose)ent modems a goin.... I want them to be
able to connect to tincans with strings and if the string breaks they'll
tie a knot in it and keep on goin...
Later
Kelley