> Hello there! This is Masaki @ Osaka, Japan.
>
> Thomas, Alexandro, Jake, MegaZone, Sherwood, Vern....
> I thank you all of you so much!
>
> On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:54:34 -1000 (HST)
> Mr/Ms "I don't work for Lucent RABU" <livingston@iav.com> wrote:
I am a mister .... though some have seen me on Halloween in a dress ;)
> > So you are VERY limited in the equipment offerings to continue using the
> > PM2 for v.90 access. As MZ recommends, going to a PM3 is a much cleaner
> > solution.
>
> Maybe the following is the only way that we could afford to receive
> 56k alalog access with PM2. Becaouse we have BRI but not PRI.
> http://www.3com.com/carrier/nsd/products/rapd/mp/remoteaccess.html
Ah, that is a major consideration only having BRI.
http://www.adtran.com/cpe/atlas/system_overview.html
The atlas 800 might be one to consider.
Hmm, since I'm bored at the moment while installing FP on NT...
http://www.perle.com/remote_main.html
Perle 833IS
http://www.tdc.co.uk/network/csm/iwcem.htm
IWCEM CSM ISDN BRI Modem.
http://www.multitech.com/products/guide1.asp?ID=7
miniarray III (I would check with their technical department about a
configuration)
http://www.osicom.com/products/access/product_info.asp?page=iqx200
iqx200 not sure if their BRI ports accept v.90
basically this was a check on +v.90 +BRI on yahoo. and glancing at
various names that popped up...
> As MegaZone and Sherwood says, I understood that to use PM3 is better
> solution than to install 56k modem expansion on PM2.
>
> Thanks Again!
np 8)
-- Aloha from Paradise,Sherwood Got Clue? If so: ISPF! The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>