> Ideally, you're looking for it to announce a single 195.89.132.128/26
> route, correct?
Yes.
> It looks like you've set the first assigned address to 195.89.132.129,
> so it won't happen. Although you're using a natural subnet boundary,
> not all subnet rules apply. You can (and indeed must) use the first
> and last addresses in the "subnet". You should have:
>
> Command> set assigned 195.89.132.128
> Command> set pool 64
But doesn't this mean that the portmaster actually allocate 195.89.132.128
to a dialup user? I didn't think you could assign network addresses to
hosts.
Regards,
-- Richard Morrell richard@ednet.co.uk System Administrator - edNET: Internet Access for Edinburgh - www.ednet.co.uk
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>