RE: (PM) AMI vs B8ZS

Jake Messinger (jake@ams.com)
Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:00:15 -0600 (CST)

On Sat, 27 Mar 1999, Kevin Sawyer wrote:

:Does anyone know if D4/AMI is standard on CT1s? I've got 24 PRIs which are
:a ESF/B8ZS and several clear-channel Ts which are also ESF/B8ZS. However, I
:just added a CT1 at a remote POP where PRI isn't available and it is
:configured D4/AMI. Is D4/AMI supposedly the "best" or "only"
:framing/linecoding for CT1s?

No, AMI/D4 is older technology and is not desireable.

~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com , ICQ# 4403734 Internet Services
Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake and Hardware

Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~

INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~''~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>