(PM) 56k vs. DMS100 Remote Service Center

Bradley Urberg Carlson (bradley@mr.net)
Wed, 31 Mar 1999 11:14:51 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Larry D Snyder, CEN, RN: "(PM) Cisco 804 stac and multilink PPP connecting with PM3"
Previous message: Thomas Kinnen: "Re: (PM) 2nd PM does not allow users access"

I'm working in a new territory that is served by a DMS100RSC. A
representative of the LEC claims that they've had problems before with
CT1s provisioned from this remote, and ISP customers have been unable to
receive V.90 calls. The LEC rep blamed this on the way DS0s are carried
over the umbilical between the switch and the remote. Does anyone know if
the DMS100RSC uses an umbilical that does not preserve the DS0s' PCM from
the CPE (my terminal server) to the switch (their DMS100)? Perhaps the
umbilical uses a SLC-like umbilical. Or maybe the DMS100RSC can only
produce a CT1 by feeding DS0's through an external channel bank?

-Bradley Urberg Carlson
MRNet

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>

Next message: Larry D Snyder, CEN, RN: "(PM) Cisco 804 stac and multilink PPP connecting with PM3"
Previous message: Thomas Kinnen: "Re: (PM) 2nd PM does not allow users access"