The same PRI E1 lines worked very well with
COMSOS 3.7.2c3. The only thing which changed
is the COMOS.
Christian
t 11:10 AM 4/2/99 +0100, you wrote:
>Hello
>I am sure Lucent will come out with some updated modem code soon.
>There are other things which effect the modems.
>One is the quality on the E1/T1 line. Errors on the line will give modems
>problems.
>I have seen telcos set their clock source to external, when they are
>supposed to be providing the clock for the PM3. Only if your E1/T1 line
>stays on zero errors, should you start looking at modem code.
>Cheers
>James
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
>> [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Christian
>> Schmit
>> Sent: Friday, April 02, 1999 10:45
>> To: Patrick Kormann
>> Cc: portmaster-users@livingston.com
>> Subject: Re: AW: (PM) performance study
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can only agree with what Patrick is saying. The PM3 has
>> very serious modem problems since COMOS 3.8 which is
>> now over 6 months old and we see no solution from Lucent.
>>
>> We now finally hear that Lucent is working on new modem
>> code but during all this time where nothing happened a lot of us
>> lost many customers!! 3COM, Ascend and Cisco perform better
>> at leat in our country that is a fact as.
>>
>> I do not need a 3.9 when 3.8.2 is still having problems.
>> The main problem we are having are random disconnects!!
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> At 10:56 AM 4/2/99 +0200, you wrote:
>> >You know what? You're an arrogant kind of person. (I'd like to
>> say something
>> >different, but I rather won't).
>> >You'd better be thankfull and pray that you never sit on a product=
you've
>> >invested millions in and that work "not quite perfect" (to keep
>> up the nice
>> >style).
>> >I'm only one person whining, but I'm thining in behalf of about
>> 100 emloyees
>> >that get bugged by thousands of customers.
>> >Of course, I'd have to shut up, so you don't have to read all this
>> >unpleasant whining.
>> >I wish you the same problems, man!
>> >Lucent is now working with us to find a solution... I hope there is one.
>> >
>> >Mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen
>> >
>> >Patrick Kormann
>> >DataComm (Schweiz) AG
>> >Projektleiter Technik
>> >--
>> >PGP Fingerprint: B52F 7B90 0DDE AADE A388 1E9B 43A6 5555 FC47 04EB
>> >
>> >-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
>> >Von: Jason Slagle [mailto:raistlin@tacorp.net]
>> >Gesendet am: Freitag, 2. April 1999 06:51
>> >An: pkormann@intern.datacomm.ch
>> >Cc: Dick St.Peters; portmaster-users@livingston.com
>> >Betreff: Re: (PM) performance study
>> >
>> >If they work so much better, go buy one. The whining is really getting
>> >kind of old. Out of the several thousand pm3's out there, I only see
>> >whining from a handful of people. Maybe that should be a clue.
>> >
>> >Sick of whining,
>> >
>> >Jason
>> >
>> >---
>> >Jason Slagle
>> >Network Administrator - Toledo Internet Access - Toledo Ohio
>> >- raistlin@tacorp.net - jslagle@toledolink.com - WHOIS JS10172
>> >
>> >On Thu, 1 Apr 1999, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> >
>> >> much of that 10% is a client modem and PM3 has yet to be
>> determined.. But
>> >> based on what other people have told me about their Ciscos and=
Ascends,
>> >> they do seem to perform better.
>> >
>> >-
>> >To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>> >'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>> >Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>> >-
>> >To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>> >'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>> >Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
>> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
>> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>