On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Jeff Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 1999 at 04:24:52PM -0800, Thomas C Kinnen wrote:
> > Actually MS-CHAP is different from CHAP (Suprised ?). It all depends on how
> > they have their clients configured. Most programs will use PAP by default
> > as of late which is why I put that as a yes.
>
> As I've been doing a bit of RADIUS hacking lately, two questions come
> to mind for the list:
>
> Can RADIUS be hacked to support MS-Chap, or is something extra required
> by the PM?
RFC's for you to peruse:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2548.html
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2433.html
> If so, where does one get the spec for MS-Chap?
> (Or can one?)
;) STFW
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/ is a wonderful location...
After a quick glance through rfc2548 seems like M$ is making something
pretty useless with additional specs (check out BAP) that at first glance
seem to be M$-centric. Oh, and MS-CHAP v2 isn't backwards compatible with
v1 or something to effect hehe... I wonder if it's y2k compliant ;)
-- Aloha from Paradise,Sherwood Got Clue? If so: ISPF! The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>