> > I'm not really trying to start trouble, but I think I'm gonna get left
> > behind on the ComOS bus.
>
> You know, it's really sad that you have to precede your message with
> "I'm not really trying to start trouble". When is it illegitimate to
> report problems on this list?
>
> That is one of my main gripes about attitudes about some PM3 supporters
> [nobody in particular here okay - just a general trend]. Don't give up
> and don't worry about stirring up trouble. If you are seeing problems,
> by all means report it to Livingston via the normal support channels and
> post it on this list. There are still some of us who don't believe the
> PM3 works well (or as good as some other equipment) in certain environments
> and if we don't share our experiences and complain things will never
> improve. Don't worry about getting your head bit off - it's happened to
> me on this and other lists when I talk about the PM3 but hey, I am still
> alive. :-)
If one follows Tim's suggestion, you really shouldn't have your head
bitten off ;) Gathering 'Me toos' can be _very_ useful if one starts
finding a trend. We've had decent success with ComOS 3.8.2, PRI GTD5 ESF
B8ZS u-law ... the hardest for me to swallow is having to limit connect
rates when other NASes don't seem to require it. Otherwise, latest v.90
client code and setting ceilings works well here.
-- Aloha from Paradise,Sherwood Got Clue? If so: ISPF! The Forum for ISPs by ISPs, <http://www.ispf.com>
- To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message. Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>