Gandalf asks for MPPP
:Received LCP_CONFIGURE_REQUEST on port S45 of 29 bytes containing:
:01 32 00 21 01 04 05 F4 03 04 C0 23 05 06 48 5D BD 8B 07
:02 11 04 05 F4 13 09 03 00 00 F3 20 A1 AD
: Packet Info: Code: 01, ID: 32, 33 bytes.
: Maximum-Receive-Unit [0x01], length: (4 bytes) 1524 bytes [0x05F4]
: Authentication-Protocol [0x03], length: (4 bytes), Password Authentication Protocol [0xC023]
: Magic-Number [0x05], length: (6 bytes), [0x485DBD8B]
: Protocol-Field-Compression [0x07], length: (2 bytes)
: Multilink-MRRU [0x11], length: (4 bytes), [0x05F4]
: Max-Receive-Reconstructed-Unit (MRRU): 1524 bytes.
: Multilink-Endpoint-Discriminator [0x13], length: (9 bytes), [0x030000F320A1AD]
: Class [0x03]: IEEE 802.1 MAC Address 00 00 F3 20 A1 AD
Gandalf asks for PAP with MPPP
:Sending LCP_CONFIGURE_NAK to port S45 of 9 bytes containing:
:03 32 00 09 03 05 C2 23 05
: Packet Info: Code: 03, ID: 32, 9 bytes.
: Authentication-Protocol [0x03], length: (5 bytes), Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol [0xC22305]
PM 3 says NAK to CHAP?
:Sending LCP_CONFIGURE_NAK to port S45 of 9 bytes containing:
:03 33 00 09 03 05 C2 23 05
: Packet Info: Code: 03, ID: 33, 9 bytes.
: Authentication-Protocol [0x03], length: (5 bytes), Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol [0xC22305]
Pm 3 says NAK to CHAP again.
:Received LCP_CONFIGURE_REQUEST on port S45 of 30 bytes containing:
:01 34 00 22 01 04 05 F4 03 05 C2 23 05 05 06 48 5D BD 8B
:07 02 11 04 05 F4 13 09 03 00 00 F3 20 A1 AD
: Packet Info: Code: 01, ID: 34, 34 bytes.
: Maximum-Receive-Unit [0x01], length: (4 bytes) 1524 bytes [0x05F4]
: Authentication-Protocol [0x03], length: (5 bytes), Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol [0xC22305]
Gandalf asks for CHAP.
:S45: Couldn't find CHAP user ctrown-i
Is this user setup for chap?
: Look at the LCP_CONFIGURE_REQUEST with ID 32. The Gandalf is clearly
:asking for PAP authentication. Next, the PM3 sends a LCP_CONFIGURE_NAK to
:using CHAP. Huh? Where did that come from? Is that right?
Dunno, why but you have MPPP configged for this user? Is this the 2nd
channel coming up?
:side question, somewhat related, why did CHAP auth fail? I have a couple of
:other ISDN boxes that use CHAP successfully, via Radius.
Cus that user is not a chap user?
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Lucent Dealer
AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@ams.com , ICQ# 4403734 Internet Services
Houston, Texas 77074 www.ams.com/~jake and Hardware
Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~' '~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>