RE: (PM) Am I loosing my mind

James Courtier-Dutton (dutton@livingston-ent.co.uk)
Sun, 18 Apr 1999 12:11:29 +0100

I cannot understand what you are doing here.
Please state the IP address/netmask you want to give the ether0 addr of the
OR.
Please also state what the static route is for.
If you set the IP address/netmask of ether0, the route entry is
automatically entered into the routing table. You don't need to add a static
route for the local LAN.
The problem is that if you have entered a static route for the local LAN, if
is quite difficult to get rid of it, but can be done.
Cheers
James

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Bob Shivers
> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 1999 06:14
> To: portmaster-users@livingston.com
> Subject: (PM) Am I loosing my mind
>
>
> Has any one ever seen this before?
> we have several remote livingston routers on our network last week we
> renumberd our entire network, here's what happened!
> we have an office router running ComOs 3.7.2L then I renumber the ether
> interface and add route network address 1.2.3.4/25 router ether address
> 1.2.3.254 and met 1 (1.2.3.4/25 1.2.3.254 1) you can't reach any
> host on the
> new network but if you add route (1.2.3.4/25 1.2.3.5 1) 1.2.3.5 is a term
> server and delete route (1.2.3.4/25 1.2.3.254 1) the network
> comes up if you
> change back to the old network it works as it should.and the same thing
> happens on an IRX114 running ComOs 3.7.2 on a differnt network.
>
> I know its been a long week but this dosent add up to me.
>
> thanks
> Bob Shivers
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>