> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com
> [mailto:owner-portmaster-users@livingston.com]On Behalf Of Christopher
> E. Brown
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 02:03
> To: MegaZone
> Cc: PortMaster Users
> Subject: RE: (PM) US West using PM4's (fwd)
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, MegaZone wrote:
>
> > The AS5800 can handle 2 T3s, and Cisco reps told me it won't scale past
> > that. It is also much larger than the PM-4 so the rack density
> isn't really
> > better.
>
> Correct, the full 5800 fills/is a 7ft rack all by itself.
>
> IIRC the PM4 can be fit 3 to a rack with space left over, giving 3
> DS3s even at current single DS3 per PM4 capibility, compared to 2 DS3s per
> rack and no plans for higher density with the 5800s.
>
> ----
> First Law of System Requirements:
> "Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about..."
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
> 'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
> Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, email 'majordomo@livingston.com' with
'unsubscribe portmaster-users' in the body of the message.
Searchable list archive: <URL:http://www.livingston.com/Tech/archive/>