Re: More up to date Linux products

Gene Imes (ebi2@ozob.net)
Sun, 11 May 1997 10:03:21 -0500 (CDT)

On Sun, 11 May 1997, Stephen Fisher wrote:

>
> I don't understand how the kernel version can have anything to do with it?
> Wouldn't a Linux binary be a Linux binary as long as it were a.out or elf
> and the same as the system.
>

When upgrading to newer kernels there is a necessity for upgrading
libraries such as libc. The Livingston software was written for Linux
1.2.13 with libraries which were current at the time 1.2.13 was current.
It is not unusual at all to have binaries written for earlier systems to
operate erraticly when trying to run on a more up to date system.

My only reason for making the original post was to let someone know that
there are probably a lot of us out here that want and need more up to date
software. I believe that users of Linux platforms are being neglected.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gene Imes http://www.ozob.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~